腾讯Workbuddy下载链接 百度 Dumate邀请码: 3V3JPSD 字节跳动TraeWork免费4500积分 Tabbit AI浏览器 MonkeyCode 长亭百智云 本文来源： https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/9ZujzWDFDclMZJYA6m7D2w 若有版权问题，请来信告知：13951431913#139.com 或在右方提交评论。 前面三篇分别聊了腾讯 WorkBuddy、阿里 QoderWork CN 和百度 DuMate(邀请码:3V3JPSD），今天收个尾，做个横评。 这三款我都在实际使用，不是云测评。下面从来源、模型、价格、能力、擅长点几个维度来比，最后说说我的选择。 三款都是“桌面端 AI 搭子”，跑在你本机，能读文件、能干活、能交成品。区别在于出品方不同，底子也不同。 WorkBuddy ，腾讯出品，和 CodeBuddy 是同一个团队、同一套技术底子，天生就会写代码。2026 年 7 月 1 日起，个人版升级为标准版、高级版、旗舰版三档体系。我使用的版本是 v5.2.5。 QoderWork CN （以下简称 QoderWork），阿里出品，是 Qoder CN 全家桶的一员，和 IDE 插件、CLI 等共享积分。2026 年 5 月起统一采用 Credits 积分计费。我使用的版本是 0.6.7，目前最新版本 0.9.11。 DuMate ，百度出品，中文名就叫“搭子”，官网口号是“真干活，用搭子”。2026 年 4 月起正式计费，目前个人体验版全量功能免费用。我使用的版本是 v1.0.52，目前最新版本 v1.0.55。 WorkBuddy 最灵活。内置云端模型开箱即用，默认 auto 自动调度，还能添加自定义模型，甚至可以接本地模型。我自己就用 llama.cpp 搭了个本地模型接上去，数据完全不出门。 对在意隐私、想省成本的人来说，这是独一份的优势。 QoderWork 内置多模型可选，默认 auto 自动调度，也可以手动指定。 DuMate 用的是百度自家的文心模型，设置里没有模型选项，不能指定，不用设置最省心。 一句话总结模型灵活度：WorkBuddy > QoderWork > DuMate。 三家都是“免费体验 + 付费订阅”的路子，但细节不同。 体验版：免费，500 积分/月 标准版：99 元/月（连续包年 672 元/年），限时每月实得 4,000 积分 高级版：199 元/月，限时每月实得 9,000 积分 旗舰版：999 元/月，限时每月实得 50,000 积分 体验版：免费，300 积分 + 2 周 Pro 试用 专业版：59 元/月，2,000 积分/月 高级版：169 元/月，6,000 积分/月 旗舰版：559 元/月，20,000 积分/月 体验版：免费，每日登录送 1,000 积分，全量功能可用 Pro 版：首月 9.9 元，次月起 59 元/月，25,000 积分/月 Max 版：首月 69 元，次月起 129 元/月，100,000 积分/月 增量包：10 元/5,000 积分 论免费额度，DuMate 最大方，每天 1,000 积分，轻度使用基本用不完。WorkBuddy 和 QoderWork 的体验版积分较少，适合先试试水。 论付费价格，QoderWork 专业版 59 元给 2,000 积分，DuMate Pro 版也是 59 元给 25,000 积分，看着 DuMate 多很多，但两家积分扣减逻辑不同，不能简单比数字。WorkBuddy 标准版 99 元贵一些，但限时加赠后实得 4,000 积分，而且能接本地模型，云端积分省着用，本地随便跑。 上面的价格对比只看了“账面上的积分数量”，但没测各家实际消耗速度。 同一个任务，三家消耗的积分数可能差不少，这取决于各自模型调用效率、任务拆解粒度等因素。 我用的都是免费版，而且是轻度使用，积分从来没用完过，所以这个维度没有实测数据。 真要付费的话，建议先关注一下同类型任务各家分别扣多少积分，这个比绝对积分数更重要。 说完了差异，说说三家都能干什么。毕竟都叫“AI 搭子”，基本功是齐的： 读文件、改文件 ：授权文件夹后，都能读取、创建、编辑文档。 写代码、做图 ：都可以提要求，自动出图、写代码。 办公文档生成 ：周报、纪要、调研报告，描述需求直接出文档，Word、Excel、PPT 都能生成。 数据分析 ：丢个 Excel 进去，自动清洗、分析、出图表、给结论。 本地运行 ：都跑在你本机，数据不额外传到别处，处理的是授权文件夹里的内容。 技能扩展 ：都有“技能市场”或“技能广场”，需要什么装什么，还能自己封装工作流。 任务可视化 ：执行过程都能看到进度，不是黑箱。 一句话： 三家都不是聊天 AI，是干活 AI。别人给建议，它们交结果。 基本功都行，但各有各的“绝活”。 写代码 ：和 CodeBuddy 同源，内置代码开发模式，这是另两家比不了的。 接本地模型 ：数据不出门，成本可控，独一份的优势。 办公杂活 ：周报、PPT、对账单、给供应商的函，批量处理很利索。 接企业微信 ：在外面用手机给电脑派活，回去看结果。 内置浏览器 ：能自己上网搜信息、抓数据、填表单，不用你来回切窗口。 出图能力强 ：能读文章内容、理解主题，直接生成匹配的配图、信息图、海报。写公众号的配图痛点，都说它解决得最好，但我没用，因为另两家的对于我来说，够用了。 输出即成品 ：Word、Excel、PPT、PDF，从处理到交付一步到位。 文件整理 ：杂乱文件夹秒变有序知识库，自动分类归档、清理重复、批量格式转换、关键信息提取。做贸易的每天收一堆报价单、合同、装箱单，这个功能太实用了。 数据分析 ：自动清洗、识别异常值、跨表关联，深度挖掘，出可视化报告。 定时任务 ：每天定时汇总数据、发简报，设好不用管。 安全认证 ：通过中国信通院双项认证，4+ 级最高评级，国产里最硬的之一。 本土化 ：百度搜索、秒哒、网盘等百度全家桶深度整合。 说再多不如看实际。这三款我都在用，分工很明确： WorkBuddy ：写公众号、写代码、搭子杂活（整理文件等）。它是我的主力，日常用得最多。 QoderWork ：写代码。偶尔在 WorkBuddy 忙不过来的时候并行跑，或者需要浏览器自动化的时候用。 DuMate ：写小说、整理文件。之前有个搁置的小说大纲，让它帮我重新梳理了人物线和时间线，还补了配图，处理得很好。文件整理也是它的强项。 三家都有“连接 IM”的功能，WorkBuddy 接企业微信和 QQ，QoderWork 接飞书、钉钉等，DuMate 接飞书、钉钉、携程等。 但我不用 IM，所以这个功能我一家都没测。也许对其他人很实用，但对我而言，Windows 机器随身携带，很难遇到需要远程派活的场景。这点不评价，只是如实说明。 先说结论： 作为成年人，我选择全都要。 这不是和稀泥。三款各有绝活，免费体验版都不花钱，同时装着按需切换，有什么不好？ 但如果只能选一个，我选 WorkBuddy 。原因有三个： 第一，我是 IMA 的重度用户，WorkBuddy 和 IMA 系出同门，比别家通过插件、MCP 连接会更可靠，当然可能是纯心理因素。 第二，我用企业微信做开发，WorkBuddy 和企业微信的打通是天然优势。 第三，它能接本地模型。数据不出门，成本可控，这点对我来说是刚需。 如果还能再选一个，那就加个 DuMate 。文件整理和数据分析是它的强项，和我的日常工作完美契合。免费版每天 1,000 积分，轻度使用够了。 至于 QoderWork，它的浏览器自动化和出图能力确实强，但我的核心需求（写代码 + 办公杂活）WorkBuddy 已经覆盖了，另外我不用钉钉，所以排在第三。 三款搭子，三家大厂，同一个赛道，各有脾气。 没有最好的，只有最合适的，以及对哪家公司的偏好。免费版都不花钱，建议都装上试试，用几天就知道哪个顺手了。 人呢，负责想清楚要什么。至于干活，交给搭子就行。 Source: https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/9ZujzWDFDclMZJYA6m7D2w If there are copyright issues, please inform us via email: 13951431913#139.com or submit a comment on the right. The first three articles discussed Tencent WorkBuddy, Alibaba QoderWork CN, and Baidu DuMate (invite code: 3V3JPSD) respectively. Today, I will wrap up the series with a horizontal comparison. I have personally used all three tools, so this is a hands-on review rather than a theoretical analysis. I will compare them based on origin, model support, pricing, capabilities, and strengths. Finally, I will share my own choice. Origins of the Three Tools All three are "desktop AI assistants" that run locally on your machine, capable of reading files, performing tasks, and delivering finished products. The difference lies in their developers and underlying technologies. WorkBuddy, developed by Tencent, shares the same technical foundation as CodeBuddy, making it inherently skilled in writing code. As of July 1, 2026, the personal version has been upgraded to a three-tier system: Standard, Advanced, and Flagship. I am using version v5.2.5.

QoderWork CN (henceforth QoderWork), developed by Alibaba, is part of the Qoder CN suite, sharing points with IDE plugins and CLI tools. It adopted a unified Credits payment system in May 2026. I used version 0.6.7, with the current latest being 0.9.11. DuMate, developed by Baidu, is marketed as "the real worker." It officially started charging in April 2026, with the current personal experience version offering free access to all features. I used version v1.0.52, with the latest update being v1.0.55. Model Selection This is a key differentiator among the three. WorkBuddy offers the highest flexibility. It includes built-in cloud models for immediate use, with "auto" scheduling as the default. Users can also add custom models or connect to local ones. For example, I connected it to a local model using llama.cpp, ensuring data privacy. This is a unique advantage for those concerned about privacy or cost savings. QoderWork supports multiple built-in models with an "auto" scheduler, allowing users to manually select the model if desired. DuMate exclusively uses Baidu's Wenxin model, with no option to switch models or adjust settings. While this makes it more user-friendly for novices, it lacks the customization options of the others. In terms of model flexibility: WorkBuddy > QoderWork > DuMate. All three follow a "free trial + paid subscription" model, but the details vary. Trial: Free, 500 points/month Standard: 99 CNY/month (672 CNY/year), temporarily granting 4,000 points/month Advanced: 199 CNY/month, temporarily granting 9,000 points/month Flagship: 999 CNY/month, temporarily granting 50,000 points/month Enterprise: Starting from 198 CNY/person/month Trial: Free, 300 points + 2-week Pro trial Professional: 59 CNY/month, 2,000 points/month Advanced: 169 CNY/month, 6,000 points/month Flagship: 559 CNY/month, 20,000 points/month Enterprise: Starting from 99 CNY/seat/month Trial: Free, 1,000 points per login, full feature access In summary, while all three cost money, their pricing models and point distributions differ, offering various options for different user budgets. Pro version: 9.9 yuan for the first month, 59 yuan/month thereafter, 25,000 points/month Max version: 69 yuan for the first month, 129 yuan/month thereafter, 100,000 points/month Incremental package: 10 yuan/5,000 points In terms of free quota, DuMate is the most generous with 1,000 points per day, which is essentially inexhaustible for light use. The trial versions of WorkBuddy and QoderWork have fewer points, suitable for testing the waters first. Regarding paid prices, QoderWork's professional version is 59 yuan for 2,000 points, while DuMate's Pro version is also 59 yuan for 25,000 points, which looks like a much better deal. However, the point deduction logic differs between the two, so the numbers cannot be directly compared. WorkBuddy's standard version is more expensive at 99 yuan, but with the time-limited bonus, the actual total is 4,000 points, and it can connect to local models, allowing for saving on cloud points and running locally at will. The price comparison above only looks at the “nominal number of points” and does not measure the actual consumption rate of each platform. For the same task, the points consumed by each platform can vary significantly, depending on their model call efficiency and task breakdown granularity. I use the free versions, and with light use, the points have never run out, so I have no real data on this dimension. If you are considering paying, it is advisable to first observe how many points different platforms deduct for similar tasks, as this is more important than the absolute number of points. Common Capabilities After discussing the differences, let’s talk about what the three platforms can do together. They are all “AI assistants,” so their basic skills are aligned: File Reading and Modification: After authorizing the folder, they can all read, create, and edit documents. Code Writing and Image Creation: You can describe requirements, and they will automatically generate images and write code. Office Document Generation: Weekly reports, meeting minutes, research reports — describe the demand, and the document is produced instantly, supporting Word, Excel, and PPT. Data Analysis: Drop an Excel sheet in, and it will automatically clean the data, analyze it, create charts, and provide conclusions. Local Execution: All run on your local machine, and they only process the content within the authorized folder, keeping data secure. Skill Extension: They all have a “skill market” or “skill plaza,” where you can install what you need and even encapsulate your own workflows. Task Visualization: The execution process is visible with progress tracking, ensuring transparency. In summary: These are not chatbot AIs, but worker AIs that deliver results, not just suggestions. Individual Strengths While they share basic skills, each has its own “special powers.” WorkBuddy is better at: Writing Code: It shares the same lineage as CodeBuddy and has a built-in code development mode, which is unmatched by the others. Connecting to Local Models: This allows for no data leakage and cost control, offering a unique advantage. Office Miscellaneous Tasks: It handles weekly reports, PPT slides, reconciliation statements, and supplier letters efficiently and in batches. Connecting to WeCom: You can assign tasks to your computer from your mobile phone and review the results later. QoderWork is better at: Built-in Browser: It can surf the web, search for information, scrape data, and fill out forms independently, saving you the hassle of switching windows. Strong Image Output: It can read article content, understand themes, and directly generate matching cover images, infographics, or posters. Many consider it the best solution for the pain points of公众号 (public account) image selection, though I haven’t tested it as the current options suffice for me. Ready-to-Use Output: It delivers high-quality Word, Excel, PPT, and PDF files ready for submission. DuMate is better at: File Organization: Instantly turn messy folders into an organized knowledge base, with auto-categorization, duplicate cleaning, batch format conversion, and key info extraction. Essential for traders receiving daily quotes, contracts, and packing slips. Data Analysis: Automatic cleansing, outlier detection, cross-table correlation, deep digging, and visualization reporting. Scheduled Tasks: Set up automated data aggregation and report sending at any time. Security Certification: Passed dual certifications from the China Information and Communication Institute, attaining the highest 4+ level rating among domestic products. Localization: Deep integration with the full suite of Baidu products like Baidu Search, Xiaodu, and Baidu Drive. What I Use Them For Actions speak louder than words. I use all three, each with a clear role: WorkBuddy: Writing public articles, coding, and miscellaneous tasks (like file organization). This is my main workhorse, used daily. QoderWork: Coding. I use it as a backup when WorkBuddy is busy or for specific browser automation needs. DuMate: Writing novels and organizing files. It recently helped me restructure an abandoned novel plot, adding character and timeline clarifications, and even inserting illustrations. Its file organization is excellent. All three support connecting to IM (instant messaging). WorkBuddy links to WeChat Work and QQ, QoderWork to Feishu and DingTalk, and DuMate to Feishu, DingTalk, and Ctrip. However, I don't use IM for messaging, so I haven't tested this feature. While it may be useful for others, it is irrelevant to me, especially since I carry a Windows machine with me, making remote task delegation unnecessary. The moment of truth. Conclusion: As an adult, I choose to have all of them. This isn't compromise. Each one has unique strengths, and the free trial versions are cost-free. Why not install all three and switch depending on the task? But if forced to choose one, I would select WorkBuddy. Reasons: First of all, I am a heavy user of IMA, and WorkBuddy comes from the same family as IMA, making it more reliable than other plugins or MCP connections — although this could be purely psychological. Second, I develop on WeChat Work, and WorkBuddy's direct integration with it is a natural advantage. Third, it supports local models. This ensures data privacy and cost control, which is critical for me. If I could add a second, it would be DuMate. Its file organization and data analysis perfectly complement my workflow. QoderWork is excellent for browser automation and image generation, but since my primary needs (coding + office tasks) are covered by WorkBuddy, and I don't use DingTalk, it ranks third. Three assistants, three major companies, one field, each with its own personality. There is no "best," only the most suitable, and personal preferences for different companies. Since the free versions are available, it makes sense to try them all and see which fits best. Humans think; assistants act. That's the way it should be. 暂无评论，快来发表第一条评论吧！ No comments yet. Be the first! 📮 需求咨询 📮 Inquiry